HPS masthead
search
What's New?
National Radiation Protection Professionals Week, 2-8 November 2008
PDF HPS Issues Position on Ensuring a Domestic Supply of Medical Radioisotopes
PDF HPS Comments on Radioactive CsCl Source Security and Replacement
October Newsletter
October Journal
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009

San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
10 October 2008

Answer to Question #5204 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Instrument Calibration (IC)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
In trying to determine an accurate counting efficiency for a NaI well counting system, a 57Co rod with activity of about 0.05 μCi is counted. In applying the formula for efficiency determination, the photon abundance of 57Co is taken into the formula. The result for most well systems is 65 percent efficiency. However, we wish to determine the actual counting efficiency for 99mTc, the material most often involved in fixture contaminations in nuclear medicine. 99mTc has a different photon abundance than does 57Co. Is it acceptable to count the cobalt rod and apply the 99mTc photon abundance in the formula? If not, what approach should be taken?
A
Yes, your approach of counting the 57Co and accounting for the actual photon abundance from 99mTc is appropriate. While the photon energies from the two radionuclides are not exactly the same, they are sufficiently close that the error is reasonably small in assuming that the detector's intrinsic efficiency for the photons from cobalt is the same as that for the technetium photons. The calculation to determine the counting efficiency for the 99mTc would go more or less as follows. I am assuming that you are using a multichannel gamma analyzer with the well detector.

Assume that a 57Co source is counted in the well of the NaI detector and that we will determine the count rate in the photopeak region of interest (we shall assume that the region of interest includes both the major photons at 122 keV with an abundance of 0.856 gammas per disintegration and the 136.5 keV photons with an abundance of 0.106, the combined gamma abundance being 0.962 gammas per disintegration). Let us assume that the source activity on the day of calibration is 0.050 μCi, which is 1.110 x 105 disintegrations per minute (dpm) and that a one-minute count yields 8.753 x 104 counts in the region of interest. The gamma counting efficiency is then determined as:

Eγ =8.753 x 104 cpm/[(1.110 x 105 dpm)(0.962 γ/d)] = 0.820 c/γ.

The radionuclide 99mTc emits gamma rays of energy 140.5 keV with an abundance of 0.889 gammas per disintegration. Assuming the same gamma counting efficiency for the photons from 99mTc as for those from 57Co, we can calculate the counting efficiency for 99mTc activity as:

E99mTc = (0.820 c/γ)(0.889 γ/d) = 0.729 c/d.

The actual value obtained will vary depending on the actual sizes of the detector and of the well and on the specification of the region of interest. I hope this answers your question.

George Chabot, PhD, CHP
Answer posted on 15 February 2006. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings