HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #5351 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Patient Issues — Diagnostic X Ray and CT

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

In the Radiology article "Estimated Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Full-Body CT Screening," David Brenner found that a full-body CT scan results in a mean effective dose of 12 mSv of radiation, which translated into a lifetime mortality risk from cancer (for a 45-year-old) of about one in 1,250. This raises the lifetime cancer mortality risk for a 45-year-old adult who undergoes 30 annual full-body exams to 1.9 percent (about one in 50).

Why does the Health Physics Society maintain that there are no observable effects to humans for a lifetime radiation dose of less than 100 mSv?

A

There are several issues associated with your question.

First, as noted in the Brenner paper, the values are estimates of both exposure values and risks. Over the years, diagnostic radiation exposure values have changed as techniques and equipment have improved. Over 30 years ago, CT technology was very primitive, and who knows what technology will look like in five years, let alone in 30 years. In addition, it is important to consider what the authors say in the next-to-last paragraph of this article.

"It is important to note that the doses and risk estimates used here are based on a particular full-body CT protocol (Brenner and Elliston 2004). Even with the same CT settings, different scanners will produce different doses and therefore different risks—we estimate by up to 35% . . ."

Second, self-referral CT scanning, which is the situation that Dr. Brenner is referring to, is not recommended by many groups, including the Food and Drug Administration and the Health Physics Society.

Third, the increased estimated increase cancer risk for 30 CT scans is 1.9 percent. As noted in "Cancer Facts and Figures," the current cancer death rate in the U.S. population is 1 in 4, or 25 percent.

Finally, it should be pointed out the HPS Position Statement is based on actual epidemiological data, not estimations.

John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist

Reference
Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 232:735-738; 2004.

Answer posted on 20 April 2006. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings