What's New?
.	Fukushima Decontamination Report
.	CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
.	America's Nuclear Future
.	February Newsletter
.	Boice Nominated President of NCRP
.	February Journal
.	February ORS
.	Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
.	Kase President's Report to IRPA
.	IRPA13 Accepting Posters

Upcoming Events
.	HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management 5-8 February 2012 Dallas, Texas
.	NRC Regulatory Information Conference NRC Regulatory Information Conference 13-15 March 2012 Rockville, Maryland
.	NCRP Annual Meeting 12-13 March 2012 Washington, DC
.	James E. Turner Memorial Symposium Call for Abstracts 18-19 April 2012 Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
.	IRPA13 13-18 May 2012 Glasgow, Scotland
.	Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting 27-30 May 2012 Halifax, Nova Scotia
.	ACS Undergrad Summer Schools 10 June- 20 July 2012
.	Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts February 2012 Bethesda, Maryland

08 February 2012

Answer to Question #5562 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Shielding

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Can you please tell me the most effective position for lead shielding during a cardiac catheterization? Should the shield be closer to the patient or closer to the investigator? We use a moveable ceiling-suspended shield and have a table-mounted shield that swivels. There is a difference of opinion on where the shields should be placed to have the maximum protection for the staff at the side of the patient. My opinion is that closer to the staff provides more protection.

In order to provide the best protection for the largest area and number of staff, the best location for the movable shield would be close to the patient and here is why. X rays travel in straight lines in the same manner as visible light. They are basically the same physical entity—electromagnetic radiation—but they differ in wavelength and frequency.

Here is an analogy to help illustrate the best position for the shield. If you take an ordinary light bulb and place a square piece of opaque material (for this example, let's use a 12"-square piece of cardboard) between the lightbulb and a wall, you'll see a shadow of the cardboard square produced on the wall. As you move the piece of cardboard closer to the lightbulb, the shadow on the wall gets larger. Conversely, as you move the piece of cardboard farther away from the lightbulb, the shadow that is cast on the wall gets smaller.

Now, comparing this example to your situation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, the patient is the "lightbulb" (i.e., the scattered radiation from the patient is the radiation source) and your portable shield is your "piece of cardboard." Thus, as you move the portable shield closer to the patient, you cast a larger "shadow" and provide shielding for a wider area and anyone who happens to be standing in that shadowed area. As in the above example, if you move the portable shield farther away from the patient, you limit the shielding benefit to smaller area.

Mack L. Richard, MS, CHP
Radiation Safety Officer

Answer posted on 13 June 2006. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.