|
||||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #5660 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Shielding The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
I am a student radiographer and I am concerned about eye
protection. I know that there is a link with occupational exposure and
cataracts but very few people wear eye protection. It seems almost
silly wearing the apron and thyroid collar and then leaving the eyes
exposed (particularly in fluoroscopy and c-arm environments). Can you
shed some light on this? Do you feel that the cost of the protective
glasses is worth the expense?
A
You are a very perceptive student and raise an excellent question.
From an experience standpoint, there are two main reasons for the low
use of leaded glasses: (1) the glasses are typically very heavy and
difficult to wear and (2) lens-of-the-eye doses are typically low
enough to not be an issue.
Answer posted on 10 August 2006. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||||||||||
| Ask a Question • Search ATE & ATE Categories • If you have Web-related problems, contact our Webmaster. If you are lost, see our site map. This page last updated 02 July 2008. | ||||||||||||||||