|
||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #5855 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Instrumentation and Measurements The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
Does the energy resolution depend on gamma-ray energy? A
Yes, in most radiation detectors intended for gamma-radiation energy
measurements, the energy resolution is dependent on gamma-ray energy.
Commonly, the percent resolution decreases as energy increases. For a
given detector, the largest single cause of this decrease is the result
of decreases in the statistical uncertainty at the higher energies.
This can be demonstrated by example for a NaI(Tl) scintillation
detector. (You can review this and more aspects of detector resolution
in more detail in Knoll's textbook, Radiation Detection and
Measurement, Wiley, 2000.)
If a 1 MeV gamma ray deposits all of its energy in the detector, we might expect about 5 x 104 electron-hole pairs to be produced. About 80% of these charge pairs result in emission of a photon of potentially detectable light, about 4 x 104 such photons being produced. The ultimate signal from the photoconverter, usually a photomultiplier tube, is proportional to this number. The one sigma Poisson uncertainty in this number is (4 x 104)0.5 = 200 electron-hole pairs; thus, the relative percent standard deviation is 200(100)/4 x 104 = 0.50%. If one did an analogous calculation for a 100 keV photon, one would obtain 1.6% relative standard deviation. These percentage uncertainties in the numbers of light photons emitted are not themselves the percent energy resolutions but are proportional to such resolutions. Thus, the percent resolution at 1 MeV is predicted to be about three times better than that at 100 keV. Similar rationale can be applied to semiconductor detectors, such as germanium and silicon, and even to gas detectors that are sometimes used for low-energy photon measurements. While the statistical uncertainty noted above contributes notably to the broadening of the photopeaks observed in gamma-ray spectrometry, it is not the only source of peak broadening. Electronic noise and various fluctuations in responses of all associated electronic components may also impact resolution. Noise effects often impact low-energy results more than high energy, making resolution worse at the lower energies. I hope this answers your question. George Chabot, PhD, CHP
Answer posted on 24 October 2006. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||||||||
| This page last updated 27 August 2011. Ask Question | Search ATE | Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Webmaster | ||||||||||||||