HPS masthead
search
What's New?
September Journal
September Newsletter
Granite Countertops and Radiation - HPS Response and Information Sheet
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009
San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
29 August 2008

Answer to Question #6078 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Shielding

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I am currently running some quality-control tests on a mammography unit. I have been measuring kVp and comparing it with nominal kVp. The unit allows selection of two different target anodes (molybdenum [Mo] and rhodium [Rh]) and two different filtrations (Mo and Rh). I know that Rh filtration is used to produce harder beams for bigger breasts. When using the combination of the Mo target and Rh filtration at low kVps, there is a considerable difference between the measurements and the nominal value on the order of 10 percent-20 percent. This happens when I am operating the machine in manual mode. The results are far better when using the auto mode. My opinion is that when in manual mode (constant mAs) at low nominal kVp, the Rh attenuates considerably more photons with kVp energy and therefore the meter measures a higher kVp. When using higher nominal kVp, more photons with kVp energy manage to get through the filtration and the meter detects more precisely the kVp peak and the right nominal value. Should I use the Mo/Mo combination?
A

For mammography, the kVp accuracy test is done with the Mo/Mo combination. That said, here is the physics:

  1. An Rh filter attenuates more of the lower-energy photons in proportion to the higher energy when compared with the Mo filter, that is, beam hardening is greater with the Rh filter for a given thickness.

  2. It does not matter if the x-ray unit is operated in manual or auto mode, since the transmitted x-ray spectrum shape is the same for a given target/filter combination.

  3. There is a finite rise time required by your kVp meter once the exposure starts that you must wait for it to register the correct "measured kVp." If this exposure is terminated during the rise time (that is, small mAs), then there will be a large discrepancy in your reading, that is, this error is inversely proportional to the mAs during this period. Assuming your meter is calibrated and reading correctly, the measured kVp converges to the set kVp during this rise time.

  4. Now returning to your stated observation, it seems that you might be operating at a lower mAs setting under manual mode and still in the early part of the rise time, whereas under AEC mode, the system sets the mAs (under auto-time) which might be large enough to set the exposure time beyond the rise time.


Kishor M. Patel, PhD, DABR
 

Answer posted on 8 February 2007. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings