What's New?
.	Fukushima Decontamination Report
.	CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
.	America's Nuclear Future
.	February Newsletter
.	Boice Nominated President of NCRP
.	February Journal
.	February ORS
.	Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
.	Kase President's Report to IRPA
.	IRPA13 Accepting Posters

Upcoming Events
.	HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management 5-8 February 2012 Dallas, Texas
.	NRC Regulatory Information Conference NRC Regulatory Information Conference 13-15 March 2012 Rockville, Maryland
.	NCRP Annual Meeting 12-13 March 2012 Washington, DC
.	James E. Turner Memorial Symposium Call for Abstracts 18-19 April 2012 Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
.	IRPA13 13-18 May 2012 Glasgow, Scotland
.	Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting 27-30 May 2012 Halifax, Nova Scotia
.	ACS Undergrad Summer Schools 10 June- 20 July 2012
.	Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts February 2012 Bethesda, Maryland

09 February 2012

Answer to Question #6773 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Homeland Security

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

We conduct a radiation casualty exercise in our emergency department. Some of the physicians and staff have taken issue with the inconvenience of double gloving for contamination. The emergency department staff only single gloves for human immunodeficiency virus. My question is, How effective is double gloving and is it worth the added time to change out gloves periodically when single-glove changing is much faster? Also, do you know of any research that has been conducted on this subject?

I consulted with a world-renowned expert on radiological emergency medical response, Fred A. Mettler, Jr., MD, MPH, Professor Emeritus of the Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico. Dr. Mettler responded to the Chernobyl accident and many other radiation accidents in his career.

Dr. Mettler said his opinion is that there is no pressing reason to double glove. He finds that wearing more gloves makes it harder to deal with getting IV lines started and doing other tactile activities. There will not be much contamination that gets through a pinhole in the glove. And any contamination on the skin is usually not a pressing issue.

He emphasized that the most important thing is to take care of medical issues: stabilize the patient, understand principles of contamination and removal, and not end up with a clean, but dead, patient.

Marcia Hartman, MS

Answer posted on 19 September 2007. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.