HPS masthead
search
What's New?
December Newsletter
December Journal
Upcoming Events
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009

San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
2009 Professional Development School
NORM and TENORM
16-18 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
20 November 2008

Answer to Question #688 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Surveys and Measurements (SM)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I have started working with TLD GR200A (Chinese) for radiotherapy doses. After six cycles(following manufacturer's instructions), average readout of 100 dosimeters has decreased three percent in a nonlinear way. Is it normal for GR200A? How can I use an individual factor?
A
The phosphor GR200, a different version of the original Lif:Mg,Ti phosphor, was developed in China and uses Mg, Cu, and P as dopants. The dosimeter has the advantage of greater sensitivity than the traditional LiF and a lack of supralinearity. It has been used successfully in many applications, including personal dosimetry, environmental dosimetry, and medical therapy dosimetry. One of the problems at the higher doses used in some medical applications has been a higher residual dose that can lead to elevated response with multiple uses. There has been work done that has shown response changes depending on the time interval between exposure and readout, but these changes have also generally been in the positive direction. I have not heard of a decrease in response as being typical for these dosimeters, although this might be possible depending on the particular anneal cycle that is being used. There are many articles in the technical literature on the evaluation and use of LiF:Mg,Cu,P. One reference with many articles on this phosphor that might be appropriate is Radiation Protection Dosimetry 85(1-4): 1999. George Chabot, CHP
Answer posted on 13 February 2001. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings