HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
07 February 2012

Answer to Question #688 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Surveys and Measurements (SM)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I have started working with TLD GR200A (Chinese) for radiotherapy doses. After six cycles(following manufacturer's instructions), average readout of 100 dosimeters has decreased three percent in a nonlinear way. Is it normal for GR200A? How can I use an individual factor?
A
The phosphor GR200, a different version of the original Lif:Mg,Ti phosphor, was developed in China and uses Mg, Cu, and P as dopants. The dosimeter has the advantage of greater sensitivity than the traditional LiF and a lack of supralinearity. It has been used successfully in many applications, including personal dosimetry, environmental dosimetry, and medical therapy dosimetry. One of the problems at the higher doses used in some medical applications has been a higher residual dose that can lead to elevated response with multiple uses. There has been work done that has shown response changes depending on the time interval between exposure and readout, but these changes have also generally been in the positive direction. I have not heard of a decrease in response as being typical for these dosimeters, although this might be possible depending on the particular anneal cycle that is being used. There are many articles in the technical literature on the evaluation and use of LiF:Mg,Cu,P. One reference with many articles on this phosphor that might be appropriate is Radiation Protection Dosimetry 85(1-4): 1999. George Chabot, CHP
Answer posted on 13 February 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings