HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #7133 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Nuclear Medicine Patient Issues — Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

I am a nurse working in a nuclear stress laboratory and am now in my first trimester of pregnancy. My office does not have lead aprons. I am wondering if I am at risk by being near patients injected with 201Tl or 99mTc sestamibi. Should I insist on an apron?

A

The radiation dose received by nursing personnel working in a nuclear stress laboratory is generally low and not a concern even if the individual is pregnant. However, it is also important to keep radiation dose ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable). In a nuclear stress laboratory, this means appropriately applying the radiation safety principles of time, distance, shielding, and contamination control.

You specifically asked about applying shielding by wearing a lead apron. The thickness of the lead makes a difference in the amount of shielding provided. You indicated use of thallium (201Tl) or sestamibi (99mTc). For 201Tl and 99mTc, a lead apron of 0.5 mm (equivalent*) lead could reduce the radiation dose up to 75 percent, and a 0.25 mm (equivalent*) lead apron would reduce the level by about 50 percent. Prior to determining if wearing an apron is appropriate, all the principles of ALARA need to be applied. Lead aprons are heavy and significantly affect a person’s mobility. Frequent wearing of lead aprons may result in back issues.

In a nuclear stress laboratory, radiation doses to nursing personnel can favorably be reduced by applying the radiation safety principles of time, distance, and contamination control. Minimize your time in any area where radiopharmaceutical dosages and/or patients who have recently been administered a radiopharmaceutical are present. Maximize distance whenever possible. Maximizing distance is one of the best and often easiest radiation safety principles to apply as a nurse in a nuclear stress laboratory. If you do not have to be in direct contact with a patient to perform your duties, step back a step or two. Moving from a couple of feet away to four feet away reduces your radiation exposure by about a factor of four (400 percent). Perform good contamination control by practicing universal precautions, washing your hands, and monitoring yourself regularly.

Finally, although the radiation dose generally received by nursing personnel working in a nuclear stress laboratory is generally low and not a concern even if the individual is pregnant, confidence and peace of mind are also important. I recommend that you discuss your concerns and specific applications of radiation safety principles with your radiation safety officer. The radiation safety officer is responsible by regulation to ensure the radiation dose to you and your fetus is maintained within regulatory limits and is kept ALARA and to provide you guidance in regard to radiation safety. If desired, declare your pregnancy and request a fetal dosimeter. Although the doses detected by most dosimeters are not available for a period of time, they do document the dose received and frequently confirm that the dose received is either indistinguishable from natural background or very low and that applying radiation safety principles minimized any radiation dose received.

Victoria Morris, MS, CHP

*The term equivalent is used here because the actual shielding material may not be lead but has the shielding characteristics that make it equivalent to either 0.5 mm or 0.25 mm of actual lead.  

Answer posted on 11 August 2011. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings