HPS masthead
What's New?
. Agency and Congressional Liaison Search
. May Journal
. May ORS
. Annual Meeting Preliminary Program Available
. Comments Requested on OSHA Dose Limits
. Poster Abstracts Accepted Until 1 June
. Health Physics Education Study Released
. April Newsletter
. ICRP Icon Sowby Dies
. Engineering Recommendations From Fukushima Study
. NAS Beebe Symposium on Reactor Accidents
. PDS on Radiation Instruments
. Update of Nuclear Power Environmental Standards
Upcoming Events
. NRC Meeting Webcasts - Live
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Conference
Managing the Risk – Perceptions and Realities
25-29 May 2014
Vancouver BC, Canada
. RPM2014
Rad Protection in Medicine
30 May - 2 June 2014
Varna, Bulgaria
. 59th Annual HPS Meeting
13-17 Jul 2014
Baltimore, MD
4th African Regional IRPA Congress
13-17 Sept 2014
Rabat, Morrocco
. Radiation Protection and Shielding Conference
14-18 Sept 2014
Knoxville, TN
. 2014 International Radon Symposium
28 Sept - 1 Oct 2014
Charleston, SC
. International Conference on Occupational Radiation Protection
1-5 Dec 2014
Vienna, Austria
. 48th HPS Midyear Meeting
1-4 Feb 2015
Norfolk/Virginia Beach, VA
18 April 2014

Answer to Question #7605 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Surveys and Measurements (SM)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:


This question is related to work with naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) in the oil and gas industry. Generally, surveys to identify equipment are contaminated (e.g., environmental law requirements) require gamma measurements using the Ludlum Type 3 meter with the 44-2 probe. The other measurement we do is when a vessel is opened or equipment is serviced for loose or fixed-surface contamination. We use the 44-9 probe for that. My question is, For health and safety purposes, how can we take the value from the 44-9 readings to institute protective measures for employees against alpha and beta, and what is a level of concern? There aren't any specific health and safety regulations for this and, generally, if the cpm (counts per minute) on the 44-9 is above 200 or 300, we have the employees wear half-face P100 respirators, tyvek, and goggles. The biggest question is, Is this enough for respiratory protection against alpha/beta? We typically see ranges of background - 2,000 or 3,000 cpm, but have had a few cases where we had 600,000 cpm without any gamma readings. We don't know what that comes from (we think 210Pb or polonium), but worry that a P100 filter might not be enough. Still, the contaminated work is not dusty so there isn't a lot of opportunity to breathe in material.  

Do you have advice on proper estimation of personal protective equipment use for employees using the 44-9 and is a P100 respirator adequate enough for high levels on the 44-9 without a dusty environment?


The decision as to whether to require the use of respiratory protection and the associated decision as to what type of respirator is necessary depends on the identity of the radionuclide(s) involved, the amount of radioactivity present in/on media accessible to workers, and the potential that accessible radioactivity will become airborne, thus representing a possible inhalation threat. Usually such decisions are made by persons in authority who have sufficient supporting information to make such decisions.

The use of respiratory protection in a formal program requires considerable preparation and testing to show that the respiratory protection is adequate for the job at hand and that the workers have been trained in its proper use and have participated in a respirator-fitting program. The respiratory protection program must be written up and should contain information necessary in making decisions about use of particular protective devices. See the OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1910.134 for specific requirements and recommendations. The state in which you are located will also have regulations that affect your operations, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and others may also be involved in regulatory aspects of importance to you.

The P-100 respirator that you refer to is a simple low-cost filtering half-mask that is adequate for protection against relatively low levels of some radioactive particulates. The highest protection factor associated with such a device is about a factor of 10. The maximum protection factor offered by a somewhat more sophisticated full-face mask (still with negative pressure) with particulate filter is about 50 (e.g., see 10 CFR 20 App. A, Protection Factors for Respirators). If a mask with particulate filter is used in which positive air pressure is maintained within the mask, the protection factor may be up to 1,000.

In order to assess the need for respiratory protection, your facility personnel should be conducting an air-sampling program that allows you to evaluate the airborne concentrations of radionuclides of interest when certain operations are ongoing. This is really the only effective way to obtain enough information to make the required judgments about whether respiratory protection is required and, if so, the type of respirator that is appropriate.

When you make measurements of exposed contamination with a particular probe, such as the thin-window Ludlum Model 44-9 pancake GM detector, you obtain a reading that is indicative of possible alpha- and beta-emitting radionuclides; gamma radiation is also detectable, but with a much lower efficiency than particulate radiations. A high reading, such as the 600,000 cpm that you note, appears as possibly indicative of relatively high levels of NORM surface contamination, but this in itself is not sufficient to be able to make a specific recommendation as to whether a particular type of respirator is necessary and/or adequate. You must know the identities of the radionuclides contributing to the observed count and must know whether the ongoing operation is such that it might produce airborne concentrations of such contaminants at concentrations of concern. There are situations in which the greatest release of activity into the air might occur when a closed system is being opened up. In such an event it is important to be taking an air sample during the time that the system is being opened as well as after, when other operations are ongoing. The measurement of the surface activity alone after the system has been opened might be informative but not adequate to tell you whether any significant airborne activity was created during the opening process.

I would like to be able to provide more quantitative information by which you could judge the significance of instrument readings, but I believe you must have more information in order to allow such estimations. Since you are dealing with NORM, I expect that you have a pretty good handle on the identities of likely radionuclides that appear in certain situations in which you are making measurements. It is important to know the relative amounts of different radonuclides that might be present and to know whether the operations being conducted are likely to generate particulate aerosols at concentrations of concern. Such information is best obtained through more quantitative measurements, especially in the context of an air sampling program carried out as operations are taking place. Representative air samples can generally be obtained using high-efficiency glass-fiber filter papers with suitable air pumps, preferably pumps that can draw tens of liters per minute through the filter in order to obtain adequate samples within reasonably short sampling times. You would have to arrange to analyze the filters to obtain quantitative estimations of the radionuclides present. I hope you are able to obtain the air concentration measurements that will assist you in making appropriate decisions about the use of respiratory protection.

George Chabot, PhD, CHP

Answer posted on 9 July 2008. The information posted on this web page is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may affect the applicability of concepts, materials, and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice. To the best of our knowledge, answers are correct at the time they are posted. Be advised that over time, requirements could change, new data could be made available, and Internet links could change, affecting the correctness of the answers. Answers are the professional opinions of the expert responding to each question; they do not necessarily represent the position of the Health Physics Society.
Home Chapters Sections Affiliates Ask the Experts Employment Meetings The Lighter Side