What's New?
•	December Newsletter
•	December Journal

Upcoming Events
•	HPS Midyear Meeting Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies 31 January - 3 February 2009 San Antonio, Texas
•	54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society 12-16 July 2009 Minneapolis, Minnesota
•	2009 Professional Development School NORM and TENORM 16-18 July 2009 Minneapolis, Minnesota

20 November 2008

Answer to Question #7645 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Nuclear Medicine Patient Issues — Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

I recently had a heart scan with 29 mCi of sestamibi ^99mTc and 4 mCi of ²⁰¹Tl. Your effective dose chart states that 2 mCi of ²⁰¹Tl would be 1,700 mrem. This is much higher than the 29 mCi of sestamibi. Is this because of the extended length of time the thallium stays in the body? Would the 4 mCi I received translate to 3,400 mrem?

More importantly, how can I get a general idea of the exposure to my child lying against me for two hours three days after the test? I was told this was safe by this time, but it would greatly ease my mind if someone could explain the actual dose equivalent to me.

The effective dose for a radiopharmaceutical depends on a number of factors. First, we calculate individual organ doses—which depend on the amount of the compound taken up in each organ and its rate of removal—then we apply "weighting factors" to the doses to each organ and sum up the contributions to get a single number that we call effective dose. More information may be found on our Web site.

^99mTc has only a six-hour physical half-life, whereas ²⁰¹Tl has a 73-hour physical half-life. Biological clearance from the body is also faster for Sestamibi (MIBI) than for ²⁰¹Tl chloride. These two factors combined lead to somewhat higher organ doses, and thus the higher effective dose, for ²⁰¹Tl chloride over sestamibi (^99mTc), even though less activity is used. Yes, you are correct about the estimated effective dose from your 4 mCi administration, although I think that this dose estimate for ²⁰¹Tl is a bit out of date. More recent values suggest a lower dose, perhaps more like 2,300 mrem for a 4 mCi administration.

It's difficult to do an accurate dose calculation for reclining next to someone for a short period, with some ²⁰¹Tl remaining in the body, in the situation you describe. I did a rough calculation, using a few different assumptions, and came up with values between 0.05-0.2 mSv (5-20 mrem). For comparison, we all receive about 3 mSv (300 mrem) every year just from natural radiation in the environment around us, and this can vary up or down, within the range of the most conservative value I estimated. So it was a very low radiation exposure, also equivalent to a few trips in an airplane.

I hope that information is helpful.

Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP
Associate Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

Answer posted on 8 July 2008. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.