HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #8147 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Environmental and Background Radiation — Water

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I have a 4 1/2-year-old son. He was born in Joliet, Illinois. Joliet, Illinois, has high levels of radium in the drinking water. The year he was born the levels of all of the different wells were at anywhere between 10 pCi/L and 24 pCi/L—I was told the water is combined from many different wells. At the time of my pregnancy and during the first year of his life (I breastfed for 11 months) I ingested this water. I tried to drink two liters per day because that is what I was supposed to do while pregnant and breastfeeding. We had a little carbon filter on our faucet, but that is the only form of filtration we used (I have since read that carbon filters are bad because they can trap radium and it can leach out over time). Anyway, I am now concerned about my son's risk of developing bone cancer or leukemia because of this water that I drank. Is it true that infants absorb much more radium than adults do—therefore resulting in greater risk to the child? After he turned one year old we began to use a reverse osmosis filtration system.
A

In the 1950s there was considerable interest in radium in drinking water in Illinois because of the finding of relatively high concentrations compared with other water supplies in the United States. There are several publications showing the range of radium concentration in drinking water in Joliet, Illinois, to be from 1 to 25 pCi/L, with an average of about 6 pCi/L.

Radium is similar to calcium in its body metabolism and most radium goes directly to bone, with just a small percentage remaining in other tissues. Because of its close association with calcium, radium in bone is reported as a ratio of radium to calcium (pCi radium/gram calcium).

The placenta does not discriminate against radium; that is, it is absorbed the same as calcium. In a very large study of radium in the skeleton as a function of age, the fetal skeleton had the same ratio of radium to calcium as children and adults.

Radium in the body is excreted very efficiently and the amount in the body is equal to about 25 days of intake. An estimate of the annual dose from ingesting even unfiltered water at 25 pCi/L and two liters per day is 20 millirem (0.02 rem). This is five percent of the annual dose from other natural background radionuclides.

Children are not at higher risk for bone cancer than adults; thus the calculated risk is very small based on radiation dose. However, of more importance is the fact that bone cancer from radium exposure is the only radiation exposure known to have a threshold, with bone cancer seen only for doses greater than about 1,000 rem.

I hope this answers your concerns.

Naomi Harley, PhD
Professor, New York University Medical School
 

Answer posted on 17 March 2009. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings