|
||||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #8498 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Doses and Dose Calculations — Internal dose calculations The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
The Environmental Protection Agency set a drinking water dose limit of 4 mrem per year for beta emitters and provides a table of isotope concentrations that will result in the 4 mrem limit. The table assumes a daily water intake of 2 liters per day and states the concentrations are based on ingestion values from National Bureau of Standards (NBS) Handbook 69. Can anyone reproduce the calculation for this table that results in 900 pCi/L for 99Tc? A
EPA (1976) based the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for man-made beta and photon emitters in drinking water on a target annual dose to the total body or any organ of 4 mrem. For these emitters the MCLs were calculated for a 2 liter per day water intake using the 168-hour maximum permissible concentration (MPC) listed in NBS Handbook 69 (NBS 1963). This was the "critical organ" philosophy of radiation protection in that period. For 99Tc, the limiting (bold print) value of the soluble 168-hour (MPC)w in NBS 69 is 3 x 10-3 µCi/cc – the critical organ being the lower large intestine (LLI). This value was derived assuming a 2.2 liter per day intake rate with the targeted annual dose to the LLI being 15 rem. One can simply "ratio" the NBS 69 value with the targeted value of 4 mrem (0.004 rem) to derive the MCL as
Multiplying by 103 cc/L and 106 pCi/µCi and then rounding to one significant figure, one obtains an MCL of 900 pCi/L. In an alternative approach, one would first derive the value of the dose per unit activity intake (in contemporary terminology, a dose coefficient) underlying the (MPC)w. Based on the NBS 69 data, the 99Tc dose coefficient for the LLI, hLLI, is
Using this dose coefficient, the concentration of 99Tc in water that would deliver an annual dose of 4 mrem to the LLI, assuming an intake rate of 2 L/d (2,000 cc/d), is
This value agrees with the corresponding value obtained via the ratio approach above. Keith F. Eckerman References
Answer posted on 10 November 2009. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||||||||||
| This page last updated 19 February 2010. Ask Question | Search ATE | Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Security Notice | Webmaster | ||||||||||||||||