HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #865 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Patient Issues — Diagnostic X Ray and CT

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Our 2½-year-old son has had five chest x rays and one lower leg x ray. Should we be concerned that he has been exposed to so much radiation?
A
There is no cause for concern. The types of x rays you describe, chest and leg, deliver very little radiation exposure. First, however, I must assume that the x rays were taken for some medical purpose and, since medical x rays should be taken only when justified by some benefit, there was some benefit from them. As parents, we need to make sure our kids have x rays only when a physician determines it is necessary. We certainly have the right to ask why they think it is necessary, e.g., what they expect to find out. We have to be careful though that we don't deny our kids the benefit of having the x rays performed when they are deemed necessary. For an adult, a typical chest x ray is equivalent to a few days' worth of natural background radiation (the radiation we're exposed to in our daily lives from cosmic radiation and naturally occurring radioactive materials), so for a two- to three-year old it would be a bit less. The lower leg x ray is equivalent to, maybe, a day's worth of background but probably much less. In total, there would be no reason to be concerned about possible biological effects. Kelly Classic Certified Medical Health Physicist
Answer posted on 15 May 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings