|
||||||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #8825 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Shielding The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
I work for an orthopedic surgeon and have a yearly exposure dose of 1.447 rem during procedures where I am required to use my hands within a fluoroscopy field. I am having difficulty finding the linear no-threshold model to determine my risk associated with this level of exposure. Once I have found this information how do I present the risk information to my employer in order to be provided appropriate shielding?
A
Your question did not indicate if your annual dosimeter total was for whole body or extremity. If it is for whole body and you work with your hands in the primary beam, the radiation dose to your hands could be significantly higher. In either case, 1.447 rem is a significant radiation dose; however, it is below the typical state dose limits of 5 rem/year for whole body and 50 rem/year for extremities.
Since this dose is below what is considered an acceptable radiation dose for an occupational radiation worker, the concern is not the risk, but the statement that you work with your hands in the primary x-ray beam. State radiation safety regulations typically prohibit any part of the body from being in the primary x-ray beam unless it is properly shielded. In the case of the hands, that would mean wearing the heavy lead gloves. If you are working with your hands unprotected in the primary x-ray beam, you should stop this practice immediately. If you are "required" to do this practice, you need to discuss this with your supervisor or the radiation safety officer for your facility. If you situation is still not resolved, you are free to contact the radiation control program for the state you are working in. Its regulations are in place to protect the patient, the worker, and the public and should also protect the individual expressing concerns over use of radiation in the workplace. Kennith "Duke" Lovins, CHP
Answer posted on 26 February 2010. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| This page last updated 27 August 2011. Ask Question | Search ATE | Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Webmaster | ||||||||||||||||||